Jude 1:9 is one of the greatest extent be around arguments to be had in a level to the ground check out to confute Michael days Christ's prehuman name. Yet, to say this one constraint underrate Jude 9 and after that implore us to be ignorant of the Greek words used in these verses. Important, in Greek Jude 9 does not say that Michael May well NOT "reprove" (EPITIMAO) Satan. Practically, what he refused to do was to "regime indecently" or bring a "guardrail stampede" (KRISIS BLASPHEMEO) in opposition to Satan.This is whatever thing that Jesus never did of a person point in time he was on earth."Krisis does not come under private of stampede. But signifies a fleeting of judgement, a shrewdness subject in the field of suchlike."-Vine's Greek Expository Dictionary; 28The NIV says: "But even the guardian angel Michael,...did not guess to bring a abusive stampede in opposition to him, but assumed, "The Member of the aristocracy reprove you!"Even as more powerful than humans, angels after that do not use unruly provocative tongue (KRISIS BLASPHEMEO) even of everyday opposers (2Pt. 2:11).And while Jesus did "reprove" (EPITIMHSAI) the demons (Mt 17:18), it is ended ostensible by the comparable doorway (Mr 9:29) that it silent was not done on his own authority but throw down prayer to God (Jn.8:15,16,28; Jn.5:19,30). This is a strange Greek word than that which Christ refused to do in Jude.So Christ's reprove of Mat 17 was not the actual as that expressed of in Jude. This reprove did not egalitarian a final judgement, a KRISIS BLASFHMEW, whatever thing even Christ will not do until God's return time (Jn.3:17; 12:47; 2Tim.4:1; Heb 2:7-9; 10:12,13; Jd.1:6).Even more, these actual words are used by "The Cherub of the Member of the aristocracy (YHWH)" at Zech 3:2. And greatest extent Trinitarians plaza that the "Cherub of Jehovah" is the Christ, a supposed theophany. So even Christ as the Cherub of the Member of the aristocracy refused to reprove Satan, but assumed at Zech 3:2: "Jehovah reprove you," in shape the words of Michael. The angel of YHWH and Michael also reacted the actual way to Satan, saying 'Jehovah reprove you' to the same extent Michael is 'the angel of YHWH'. Whichever Jesus had to be Answer the power to regime (KRISIS) (2Pet. 2:11; Heb. 2:7-9; 10:12,13). Yet, even thus it would not be of his own authority (Jn 5:19,30). So, Jesus didn't run happy of Jehovah's payable time for concern with Satan. He after that waited on God in heaven after reincarnation.So, point in time also Michael and Christ refused to right away reprove Satan, now they All do! In Rev 12:7 Michael rebukes Satan in the greatest extent effective way, defeating him in struggle with HIS angels, casting him down to the earth and thus hurling him now the fallacy (Rev. 20:1-3). This is whatever thing that the Scriptures assumed Christ would do (Mt 8:29).As a result, Jude 9 does not accumulate Jesus from days Michael. Once more, *both* Michael and Jesus had to settle for God to right their action in opposition to their enemies.Jehovah's Witnesses' philosophy is not dramatic in the smallest amount if Michael is not Christ. As a result, it is no production if our logical conclusions concerning Michael are proved off beam while folks new scrolls are opened! (Jn.17:3; 1Jn.4:15; Rm.10:9) On the other hand, Trinitarians are animate of the difficulties caused if Christ is acknowledged as Michael due to the preposterously strong implications of his submissiveness.Even if present-day is no notation that Jesus is not Michael, the philosophy that Jesus is not God almighty is a very ostensible and unconcealed teaching in the Bible. At smallest possible 17 times scriptures say that Jesus has a God higher him which in a good way proves that Jesus cannot be Almighty God (Mic.5:4; Ps.45:7; 89:26; Mat.27:46; Mk. 15:34; Jn.20:17; Rom.15:6; 1Cor.11:3; 15:24-28; 2Cor.1:3; Eph.1:17; Heb.1:9; 1Pt.1:3; Rev.1:6; 3:2,12).And Scriptures steadily check that Jesus is less than God at every importance of his duration. At the mountaintop line of reasoning he will ever go with, Jesus silent has a God higher him and is "inclined" to *GOD* the actual way we are "inclined" to him (Jn. 14:28; 1Cor.15:27,28).Now, a comparable of Biblical statements lead to the claim and logical presume that Michael was Christ's harmonious name. At the same time as of this burly scriptural notation that Michael is Christ, even innumerable Trinitarians generate harden that Michael is one of the names of the Christ, by greatest extent beforehand Catholic and Protestant"Cathedral Fathers," and innumerable modern scholars.SOURCE: This is the Extreme Response to this smidgen from Yahoo! AnswersSuperfluous READING:Seraph - Links to Summary
