Monday, 27 December 2010
Sunday, 26 December 2010
"Eight the upper crust were arrested and six officers were disrespected once upon a time a reveal swept regulate the Sydney CBD this afternoon. Legalize held that, about 1pm today, a group marched from Sydney Community Vestibule to Martin Place, anyplace a campaign occurred amid protesters and normalize come out a accommodation residence the US consulate."
"The protests were ["ostensibly"] triggered by a US point, Wholesomeness of Muslims, portraying the priest Muhammad as a womaniser and paedophile."
Muhammad IS a womanizer and a pedophile. He matrimonial Aisha at age 6 and consummated his marriage with her at her age 9. This fact is recorded in the traditional hadiths, and published according to traditional Muslim sources.
1. Watt, "AISHA", Book of Islam Online
2. D. A. Spellberg, Politics, Masculinity, and the Islamic Past: the Legacy of A'isha bint Abi Bakr, Columbia Researcher Crowd, 1994, p. 40
3. Karen Armstrong, Muhammad: A Biography of the Analyst, Harper San Francisco, 1992, p. 157.
4. WIKISLAM: KORAN, HADITH AND SCHOLARS: AISHA
Honest blogger Pamela Geller on Fox and Friends this be born explains how Barack Obama is sanctioning the right mind through the cruel Muslim riots by difficult to peaceful the Muhammad filmmakers. Geller held of the issue: "YOU CANNOT ASK ME TO PREY MY PERMISSION SO AS NOT TO DELICATE SAVAGES." (GROUP) Safety video offer
In Obama's counter, he held "...We jettison hard work to dirty the holy beliefs of others..."
Obama, this is not holy belief. It is cruel rage.
The anti-American protests are diffusion. Once again 20 nations now hold had protesters conduct yourself mistreatment for example of the point Wholesomeness of Muslims. Contemporary are news update of the reveal in Sydney, and in China. The NY Get older has a map, THIS Contrast takes you acquaint with. It was compete efficient yesterday but but is unworried encouraging.
In is singular link that was efficient 14 report ago, from USA Currently. It ends this way: "Surrounding 1,500 reveal in the eastern Afghanistan urban of Jalalabad, commotion "Demise to America
I think the big shout in the dam was 9/11/01, and the drifting apart of the dam was the killings at the US Embassies move backward in the week. We hold seeing that seen the rage travel to 20+ nations. SUDAN Virtuously REJECTED A US Discriminate to allow US Marines to make a way into the brawn so as to protect US services and bureau acquaint with.
In my pay attention I don't see the rage cultivating down any time later on. This is an age of sin, revulsion, ill will and apostasy. Day by day, personal property are NOT departure to get partisan. Virtuously be synchronize for that, Brethren. But the promises of Jesus are true and accurate. No comfort what we gather on earth in the coming days, they are but a tip and a mist compared to the luck of His ceremony. (ROMANS 9:23).
Friday, 24 December 2010
The symbol of the knot relates to tying something
together, or to keep something stable. Stability
in astrological magick would include the fixed
signs of Aquarius(air); Leo(fire); Taurus(earth);
and Scorpio(water). With this in mind, you could
cast this spell when the moon is in any of these
signs (check your magickal or planetary almanac),
or you could fine-tune your enchantment by
considering the nature of the sign. Air speeds,
fire encompasses, water cleanses and earth roots.
Call on the four elements to ensure success.
Supplies: Four ribbons, 17 inches long, in red,
white, green, and blue. (red for passion, white for
purity, green for growth, and blue for wisdom); 2
small bells to thread on the ends of the ribbons;
perfume or aftershave; a lock of your own hair.
Instructions: Cleanse, consecrate, and empower all
items. Take the ribbons and place one on top of the
other, ends matching. recite the following as you
tie each knot, beginning in the center of the
ribbon bunch and working outward on each side:
With knot of one, this loves begun
With knot of two, love shines through.
With knot of three, love comes to me.
With knot of four, my heart will soar.
With knot of five, this spell's alive.
With knot of six, the love is fixed.
With knot of seven, by blood and kin,
this spell is cast and love comes in!
Force and form attend to me,
as I will, so mote it be!
Thread a bell on each end of the ribbon bunch.
Attach your lock of hair. Spray ribbon with perfume
or aftershave saying:
The breath of the Goddess sparks the flame.
True Love lives and knows my name.
Tie ribbon bunch around ankle, wrist, onto your
purse, or place in your pocket. Each night for
seven nights, repeat the "The breath of Goddess"
charm seven times while swinging the ribbons in a
clockwise direction. One the eighth night, hang the
ribbons over your bed and leave them there. Anytime
you lose confidence, ring the bells. Don't forget,
love magick requires patience!
Silver RavenWolf - "The Ultimate Book of Shadows
for the New Generation, Solitary Witch, page 522
Credit: pagan-magic.blogspot.com
Reference: just-wicca.blogspot.com
Wednesday, 22 December 2010
Love Magick is a broad category of workings that includes a range from platonic Friendship, Attraction, True Love, and Compatibility to Hot Sex and Get Laid formulations. My other main recommendation is to be careful (and very specific) what you ask for!
SHORT LIST: Find Love oil, Find Love for Women oil, Find Love for Men oil, Long Love for Couples oil, Friendship oil, Passion oil, Love incense, Lust incense, Love bath herbs, Love mojo kit, Love room spray, Spell to Find Love, Aphrodite oil
OILSFind Love oilFind Love for Women oilFind Love for Men oilLong Love for Couples oil Friendship oilMagnet oilPassion oilVenus oilINCENSESLove incenseLust incenseParty incenseMoon incenseVenus incenseBeltane incenseDragon's Blood resinBATH MAGICKLove bath herbsMOJO KITSLove mojo kitLibido mojo kitROOM SPRAYSLove room spraySPELL KITSSpell to Find LovePILLOWSMarital Bliss dream pillowBOTANICALSBeth RootTonka BeansBREWS AND TEASAphrodite's Beltane BrewDEITY OILSAphrodite oil Chango oilFreya oil Hera oilInanna oilOshun oilPan oilSatyr oilVenus oil
Reference: animals-and-shamanism.blogspot.com
From The Paris Review, a long interview with Marilynne Robinson, author of "Gilead" and, most recently, "Home". She is a Christian and, at one point the intervewer asks her whether she thinks of herself as a "religious writer." Robinson answers "I don't like categories like religious and not religious. As soon as religion draws a line around itself it becomes falsified. It seems to me that anything that is written compassionately and perceptively probably satisfies every definition of religious whether a writer intends it to be religious or not." Later the interview turns to the relationship between religion and science:
I read as much as I can of contemporary cosmology because reality itself is profoundly mysterious. Quantum theory and classical physics, for instance, are both lovely within their own limits and yet at present they cannot be reconciled with each other. If different systems don't merge in a comprehensible way, that's a flaw in our comprehension and not a flaw in one system or the other.
Are religion and science simply two systems that don't merge?
The debate seems to be between a naive understanding of religion and a naive understanding of science. When people try to debunk religion, it seems to me they are referring to an eighteenth-century notion of what science is. I'm talking about Richard Dawkins here, who has a status that I can't quite understand. He acts as if the physical world that is manifest to us describes reality exhaustively. On the other side, many of the people who articulate and form religious expression have not acted in good faith. The us-versus-them mentality is a terrible corruption of the whole culture.
You've written critically about Dawkins and the other New Atheists. Is it their disdain for religion and championing of pure science that troubles you?
No, I read as much pure science as I can take in. It's a fact that their thinking does not feel scientific. The whole excitement of science is that it's always pushing toward the discovery of something that it cannot account for or did not anticipate. The New Atheist types, like Dawkins, act as if science had revealed the world as a closed system. That simply is not what contemporary science is about. A lot of scientists are atheists, but they don't talk about reality in the same way that Dawkins does. And they would not assume that there is a simple-as-that kind of response to everything in question. Certainly not on the grounds of anything that science has discovered in the last hundred years.
The science that I prefer tends toward cosmology, theories of quantum reality, things that are finer-textured than classical physics in terms of their powers of description. Science is amazing. On a mote of celestial dust, we have figured out how to look to the edge of our universe. I feel instructed by everything I have read. Science has a lot of the satisfactions for me that good theology has.
But doesn't science address an objective notion of reality while religion addresses how we conceive of ourselves?
As an achievement, science is itself a spectacular argument for the singularity of human beings among all things that exist. It has a prestige that comes with unambiguous changes in people's experience-space travel, immunizations. It has an authority that's based on its demonstrable power. But in discussions of human beings it tends to compare downwards: we're intelligent because hyenas are intelligent and we just took a few more leaps.
The first obligation of religion is to maintain the sense of the value of human beings. If you had to summarize the Old Testament, the summary would be: stop doing this to yourselves. But it is not in our nature to stop harming ourselves. We don't behave consistently with our own dignity or with the dignity of other people. The Bible reiterates this endlessly.
Thanks to GetReligion for the reference.
ROBINSON
I read as much as I can of contemporary cosmology because reality itself is profoundly mysterious. Quantum theory and classical physics, for instance, are both lovely within their own limits and yet at present they cannot be reconciled with each other. If different systems don't merge in a comprehensible way, that's a flaw in our comprehension and not a flaw in one system or the other.
INTERVIEWER
Are religion and science simply two systems that don't merge?
ROBINSON
The debate seems to be between a naive understanding of religion and a naive understanding of science. When people try to debunk religion, it seems to me they are referring to an eighteenth-century notion of what science is. I'm talking about Richard Dawkins here, who has a status that I can't quite understand. He acts as if the physical world that is manifest to us describes reality exhaustively. On the other side, many of the people who articulate and form religious expression have not acted in good faith. The us-versus-them mentality is a terrible corruption of the whole culture.
INTERVIEWER
You've written critically about Dawkins and the other New Atheists. Is it their disdain for religion and championing of pure science that troubles you?
ROBINSON
No, I read as much pure science as I can take in. It's a fact that their thinking does not feel scientific. The whole excitement of science is that it's always pushing toward the discovery of something that it cannot account for or did not anticipate. The New Atheist types, like Dawkins, act as if science had revealed the world as a closed system. That simply is not what contemporary science is about. A lot of scientists are atheists, but they don't talk about reality in the same way that Dawkins does. And they would not assume that there is a simple-as-that kind of response to everything in question. Certainly not on the grounds of anything that science has discovered in the last hundred years.
The science that I prefer tends toward cosmology, theories of quantum reality, things that are finer-textured than classical physics in terms of their powers of description. Science is amazing. On a mote of celestial dust, we have figured out how to look to the edge of our universe. I feel instructed by everything I have read. Science has a lot of the satisfactions for me that good theology has.
INTERVIEWER
But doesn't science address an objective notion of reality while religion addresses how we conceive of ourselves?
ROBINSON
As an achievement, science is itself a spectacular argument for the singularity of human beings among all things that exist. It has a prestige that comes with unambiguous changes in people's experience-space travel, immunizations. It has an authority that's based on its demonstrable power. But in discussions of human beings it tends to compare downwards: we're intelligent because hyenas are intelligent and we just took a few more leaps.
The first obligation of religion is to maintain the sense of the value of human beings. If you had to summarize the Old Testament, the summary would be: stop doing this to yourselves. But it is not in our nature to stop harming ourselves. We don't behave consistently with our own dignity or with the dignity of other people. The Bible reiterates this endlessly.
Thanks to GetReligion for the reference.


