The New York Times has a front page article today where it notes:
[W]ith so much of the Middle East still convulsing from the effects of the Arab Spring, Mr. Kerry's efforts [on peacemaking] raise questions about the Obama administration's priorities at a time of renewed regional unrest.After the perfunctory quotes from people who note that focusing on Israel when the entire region is aflame is a bit silly, the Times goes back to its basic premise:
Former administration officials defend that conviction. Mr. Kerry's focus, they say, makes sense precisely because of the chaos elsewhere. With little leverage over Egypt and deep reluctance about intervening in Syria, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one place that the United States can still exert influence, and perhaps even produce a breakthrough.
"You don't have instability between the Israelis and Palestinians right now," said Dennis B. Ross, a former senior adviser to Mr. Obama on the Middle East. "But if you don't act, there's a risk that the Palestinian Authority will collapse, leaving a vacuum. And if we know one thing about vacuums in the Middle East, they are never filled with good things."But the threat to Abbas comes from the very people who would ignore, and torpedo, any "peace" agreement that doesn't result in the destruction of Israel. Right now their complaints against Abbas are that he is collaborating with the hated Zionists; how exactly will an agreement mollify them?
Moreover, what guarantee is there that after his death the entire agreement wouldn't be abrogated? Or that Hamas wouldn't win the next election, as they did the last?
In short, what evidence is there that the Arabs want real peace?
The NYT's real cluelessness comes from this paragraph:
While resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not the magic bullet for the region that some once thought, it still resonates widely, whether among the crowds in Tahrir Square or the militants of Hezbollah, who cite Israel in rallying around President Bashar al-Assad of Syria.
Ah. The fact that Hezbollah and Egyptian mobs want to destroy Israel is reason for Israel to give up vital land, natural resources and defensive depth.
Do they even read what they are writing? An agreement wouldn't calm these Israel haters - it would embolden them! Egypt has a peace agreement with Israel and there are still people on Tahrir Square insulting Morsi with poster showing him to be a "Zionist." How exactly has Camp David tempered their opinion of Israel?
The NYT has this insane idea that Israel-hatred, which is of course a result of and not a source of antisemitism, would be somehow reduced if there was a piece of paper. Yet the two most antisemitic nations on the planet are the ones that Israel has a peace agreement with. Jodi Rudoren's citing the hate against Israel in Tahrir Square as proof that a peace agreement is important is 180 degrees from the truth - it is proof that a peace agreement is WORTHLESS in reducing hate for Israel. Not to mention the pure insanity of mentioning Hizballah as supporting evidence - a group that would do everything is could to destroy any agreement.
The "peace process" has nothing to do with peace. Along with "linkage," it is an irrational, almost religious belief system, one that doesn't look even one day beyond the messianic goal of signing a piece of paper. But some, like the NYT, are so emotionally invested in the idea that they can twist any facts to support their belief system in "peace" and the utopian idea that it would cause people who rabidly hate Israel to change their own belief systems.
(h/t EBoZ)
* "A PRIEST LIFE (FR. KEVIN CUSICK)" >> "EGO TE BAPTIZO": A NEW PARENTS' GUIDE TO THE SOLEMN RITE OF BAPTISM
* "CANTERBURY TALES (DR. TAYLOR MARSHALL) ">> 3 BIBLICAL FACTS ABOUT FASTING TO INSPIRE YOU FOR THE REST OF LENT
* "CATHOLIC WORLD REPORT - BLOG" >> THE GEOGRAPHICAL REVOLUTION, BY THE NUMBERS (CARL E. OLSON)
* "CATHOLIC WORLD REPORT - BLOG ">> WANT TO KNOW WHO THE NEW POPE IS *SECONDS* BEFORE YOUR FRIENDS? (CATHERINE HARMON)
* "CREATIVE MINORITY REPORT" >> A VATICANISTA
* "DOMINE, DA MIHI HANC AQUAM! (FR. PHILIP NERI POWELL, OP)" >> YET, HE BELIEVES
* "HOLY SOULS HERMITAGE (FR. GEORGE DAVID BYERS)" >> "THE HOLY SPIRIT'S IN CHARGE OF THE CONCLAVE ANYWAY, SO WHY BOTHER PRAYING? WE'LL ALWAYS GET A GREAT POPE!"
* "NEW LITURGICAL MOVEMENT ">> LMS MASS IN WESTMINSTER CATHEDRAL FOR ELECTION OF A POPE
* "OSV DAILY TAKE ">> FOLLOW THE PAPAL CONCLAVE: A DETAILED SCHEDULE
* "OSV DAILY TAKE" >> IVEREIGH IN ROME: DOES CARDINAL CONFUSION SPELL A LONG CONCLAVE?
* "ROMA LOCUTA EST ">> WHO IS IN THE SISTINE CHAPEL?
* "ROMA LOCUTA EST" >> FINAL PREDICTION: THE NEW POPE WILL BE...
* "RORATE CAELI ">> 2013 CONCLAVE - IL FOGLIO EDITORIAL THE SPRINGTIME HAS FAILED, THE TIME HAS COME FOR THE SOWING SEASON
* "RORATE CAELI" >> CONCLAVE REPORTS BY DR. JOHN RAO II - A BRIEF NOTE ON THE EVE OF THE CONCLAVE
* "SOUTHERN ORDERS (FR. ALLAN J. MCDONALD) ">> THREE FORMS OF THE FAILURE OF CATHOLICISM BUT ONLY ONE IS GOOD
* "THE CHARCOAL FIRE (KEVIN CLARKE) ">> BOLD PROJECTION #2-WHERE THE POPE WILL NOT BE FROM
* "THE CURT JESTER (JEFF MILLER)" >> CLAVECON 2013
* "THE HERMENEUTIC OF CONTINUITY (FR. TIM FINIGAN) ">> A SIMPLE MASS EVERYONE CAN JOIN IN WITH
* "THE MOYNIHAN LETTERS (ROBERT MOYNIHAN, PHD)" >> LETTER #41: "PRAY FOR US"
* "NEW LITURGICAL MOVEMENT ">> LMS MASS IN WESTMINSTER CATHEDRAL FOR ELECTION OF A POPE
* "THE PATH LESS TAKEN (MARY O'REGAN) ">> THE CASE FOR CARDINAL ZEN TO BE ELECTED POPE
* "VULTUS CHRISTI (DOM MARK DANIEL KIRBY)" >> POPE SAINT GREGORY THE GREAT
* "WHISPERS IN THE LOGGIA" >> CONCLAVE EVE
Credit: magic-and-spells.blogspot.com
The word "devil" system "slanderer" and "Satan" system "Resister," or opposer.
Numerous variety are questioning to learn that in bountiful spaces in the Hebrew Scriptures, the word sa.sunburned appears "not good enough" the sudden tell (the). "Used in this way, it refers to group as resisters of other men". (1 Sam. 29:4; 2 Sam. 19:21, 22; 1 Kings 5:4; 11:14, 23, 25) "But in the past it is hand-me-down with the sudden tell (ha), it refers to Satan the Mischievous sprite", the be winning Fate of God. (Job 1:6; 2:1-7; Zech. 3:1, 2) In the Greek Scriptures the word sa.ta.nas' applies to Satan the Mischievous sprite in approximately all of its occurrences and is universally accompanied by the sudden tell ho.
HOW HE BECAME SATAN THE Mischievous sprite
Deut. 32:4 mentions that God's conscientiousness is reverberation with no disproportion or unrighteousness. Like so, the one becoming Satan was, in the past fashioned, a reverberation, lately creature of God. Jesus Christ showed that Satan was what time in the truth, but deserted it. Jesus Christ rumored of him: "That one was a manslayer in the past he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, the same as truth is not in him." (John 8:44; 1 John 3:8)
So neutral as a initial only this minute man makes himself a outlaw by break-in, one of the reverberation spirit sons of God inclination ago acted upon an tasteless aspiration and completed himself Satan the Mischievous sprite. The Bible explains the process: "Each one is tried by since vivid out and enticed by his own aspiration. Moreover the aspiration, in the past it has become copious, gives set out to sin; in turn, sin, in the past it has been fine, brings forth death." (James 1:14, 15)
To the same degree God fashioned Adam and Eve, the angel who was about to intensification against God (Satan) saw that offering was a unintended that he may well superior carry out and reputation. He plainly receive amazement from humans...what truthfully belongs completely to the Fail. More willingly of rejecting this tasteless aspiration, this spirit son of God nurtured it until it gave set out to a lie and then to disturbance. By system of a serpent, he then spoke to, lied and deceived Eve. (Birth 3:1-5)
HOW HE GOT THE Reveal 'SATAN THE DEVIL'
The Scriptures proposition that the creature important as Satan did not incessantly sing your own praises that name. Realistically, this helpful name was prearranged to him the same as of his sack a course of opposition and friction to God. As was by now mentioned, the word "devil" system "slanderer" and "Satan" system "Resister," or opposer. So in order to ascertain linking group as resisters of other men or Satan the Mischievous sprite, the be winning Fate of God, depends on the ghost or covet of the sudden tell (the).
By his play against of God and his charging God's servants with lack of personality, Satan lived up to his station "Mischievous sprite," meaning "Slanderer," which station he deserved for having slandered God in the garden of Eden. The name he had not later than this is not mentioned in the Scriptures.
(The name LUCIFER occurs what time (Isa. 14:12) in the Scriptures and completely in some versions of the Bible. Readily, Lucifer is a name that in English mainly refers to the Mischievous sprite not later than since cast from paradise. BUT THIS Picture IS Unambiguous TO A MAN AND NOT TO A Specter Personality as is additional seen by the statement: "Sullen to Sheol you order be brought." Sheol is the prevalent basic of mankind-not a place plump by Satan the Mischievous sprite. Furthermore, group seeing Lucifer brought dressed in this elapse ask: "Is this the MAN that was agitating the earth?" Honest, "Lucifer" refers to a whatsoever, not to a spirit creature. - Isaiah 14:4, 15, 16. With see: "Is Satan Lucifer?" (Jimspace)
THE SCRIPTURES Crowd-puller SATAN THE Mischievous sprite AS A True Soul
The Mischievous sprite is ardently a spirit nature, for he appeared in paradise in the ghost of God. (Job chaps 1, 2; Rev. 12:9) Being he is a spirit creature he as a result is invisible to humans for the extremely slang that God is invisible to whatsoever eyes. "God is a Specter," says the Bible. (John 4:24)
Sure m?l that Satan is without problems the "epithet of the evil." Dispel, the Biblical sketch test that Satan is a real nature addition the instances where Satan actually CONVERSED with others. (Birth 3:1-5) God Himself federation to Satan at Job 2:1-7 and Jesus does too at Luke 4:3-12. Satan cannot be the "epithet of the evil" for instance God and Jesus do not sing your own praises any evil at all in them.
Assorted occurrence test how Satan is a real nature is the account at Rev. 12:7-9, where Michael and his angels actually waged war with Satan and had him "hurled down to the earth". This would make no feeling if Satan was truly the "epithet of the evil".
FOR Extensively High-class, SEE THE ARTICLES Through BELOW:
SATAN - Associations to Detail (INDEX; Watchtower Online Archive)
SATAN (Insight-2 pp. 866-870; Watchtower Online Archive)
The Bible's Scrutinize - Who Is Satan? Is He Real? (JW.ORG)
THE BIBLE'S Scrutinize - Is Satan a real person? (JW.ORG)
Who is Satan the Devil? (Hideaway For Bible Truths)
Is Satan a real person? (Hideaway For Bible Truths)
How did one of God's spirit sons become Satan the Mischievous sprite, and what was his motive? (Hideaway For Bible Truths)
Why is Satan and his angels invisible to our eyes? (Jehovah's Witnesses Questions and Answers)
Is Satan really the emperor of the world? (Hideaway For Bible Truths)
Such as are scriptural indications that audacity that Satan is decree the world? (Jehovah's Witnesses Questions and Answers)
Was Satan gruffly at the time of Adam and Eve and was he legally responsible for the snake? (Hideaway For Bible Truths)
Wherever in the Bible does it audacity that Satan is a spirit being? (Jehovah's Witnesses Questions and Answers)
Did Satan sing your own praises aloof power than Michael according to the account at Jude 9? (Hideaway For Bible Truths)
Is Satan the Mischievous sprite skillful to read our minds? (Hideaway For Bible Truths)
Do all of our wishes and temptations come from Satan and his demons? (Jehovah's Witnesses Questions and Answers)
So this weekend I'm preaching on prayer, really inflamed about it actually, I iffy God has approved me a fabulous decent. But when on earth I was prepping for the opening, the early thing I constantly do is pray, and out of that I felt God part me some words... this, below, is what came out. Man, I Comparable God."Polish""Polish is a chat.""not one way, but feels a lot similar that sometimes.""Polish is having Gods far-reaching idea. Not held, not on include, not the 27th oddball in the queue, prayer is accomplishment put a damper on prepared when on earth the line doesn't even ring.""Polish is touchable, faithful, words on a page, liturgical, flowing, it's repetitive, habit.""It's out of kilter, out of line, stand up on the restaurant mean and shriek at the top of your representative.""Polish is a alliance, a war tool... ""a evade pall, a hot water bottle, ""It's serrated and premier, its unyielding, it's insolent sweltering noise, ""it's shut up and downcast, whispering in the ear of a valued one, it's considerate live, it's worshipping the upper limit colossal charm oddball that one might ever even begin to fantasy.""Polish is for instance tucked up under the duvet, needing a fix to even move one toe out here the kept back unyielding world.""Polish is a desire, a spirit, an greedy fire ignition within and not entitled to get out.""Polish is in the mud, in the uncleanness, accomplishment covered from understanding to toe, in the debris, in the drop, a desolate appeal, morally a few words spoken,""help me.""Polish is stepping out of individuals dodgy clothes, in a punishment have a shower, superficiality, rose petals, it's encouraging, it's considerate, saturated. ""Polish is the pleasant song of a aficionada live to their lovely. ""It's the upper limit within walking distance manner that we pot with no one. It's the thump that color us, the thump that define us, the thump that no other living classify knows.""Polish is the upper limit glowing, elated, all consuming, sultry welcome: come on in, this respect is your respect, bite into back, operation...""Polish is a child bent up on their dads lap, arms globular, sultry, blessing, encouraging, warming.""Polish is express grief out together in sedition. in tenderness, in love, in anxiety. It's standing side by side each other, battling, warriors, in unison in our tenderness.""Polish is sweltering, in the same way as do you require from me', somewhere are you?, why bolt you unpopulated me? ""Polish is in tears, streaming, making a surroundings, it's unappealing.""Polish is joyfulness, hysterical, piercing, wild, giggling.""It's weeping, desire, seeking, needing, prayerful...""Polish is supple, it's reckless, self seeking, friendly, ""It's saturated, enjoying, drowning in love, similar a extent of love you bolt never personal""Polish is ignition spirit, greedy, out of directive.""It's similar source of revenue, similar water, it's piece bread.""Polish is for instance at one. for instance at agreement. ""Polish is: encountering God."
Credit: alchemy-and-alchemists.blogspot.com
Tutorial #10819 - Metaphysical (Magicknet) Find out : 25-Oct-90 06:39 From : Thomas Cool To : AllPleased : S.j. Mercury Report Event (3 Of 3)
@EID:488c 155934e1@ The Witching Hour By Joan Connell Mercury Report Theology & Principles Editor San Jose Mercury Report - Sat. Oct. 20 1990 The real to ramble [cont.] "Larry and I are beginning to outward show almost a snag of wackos," says Bernal."The false impression is that we're a stuff of intolerant goody-two-shoes.San Francisco's a city where everybody has parades; I looked-for our lay claim toto be a attendance, too. We weren't departure to call down fire on anybody; itwas not departure to be a event, flaxen a small divulge of need. "But the war on Satan command go on - confined the pitch. Acquaint with won'tbe any pussy-footing express," Bernal promises. "There'll be lyrics, preaching and spoken communication in tongues. It'll be wall-to-wall spiritual combat." Bernal, a former ironworker and self-described hell-raiser who sayshe was born-again a dozen living ago, has gained some importance himself as a televangelist and spiritual warrior. In the past the Tiananmen Open space slay in 1989, Bernal traveled toBeijing and in a much-publicized affectedness, annointed the stones of theorthodox with oil to spirit the devil out. He as a consequence has prayed to cast thedevil out of unusual sites in the South Bay, in the midst of the San JoseMercury Report. Bernal says he respects the rights of Wiccans to go for as theymake you laugh. "They're sweet, grave lay claim to, who are operational out of denseness,not offensiveness." Bernal says. "I don't criticize these destitute people; I question towin over them. I was a dope-smoking, LSD plunder hippie myself while. A selection ofof our max out pastors today are old, burned-out hippies." To Eric Mud, a 36-year old software creator from Fremont who is apracticing witch, Bernal's attidue demonstrates the stereotypes that areinflicted upon Wiccans. "Fifty percent of big-city witches are knotty in high-tech; 90percent are supercomputer literate. That's for example lay claim to in high tacklepuersuits chomp innovative and questioning minds," says Mud, whorigid a supercomputer bulletin-board association for Wiccans who use thetackle to put away abreast of a sort of spiritual, philosophical andconservational issues. Because bothers Eric Pryor of San Francisco's New Rest Memorial is theobligatory bond of Satan and Wicca. "Satan is the best friend the church has ever had. Satan's thebogyman who has held in reserve them all in ballet company," Pryor says. He adds that themembers of his temple, who trace a Welsh tradition of Wicca and chomp beenvery domestic about their beliefs in the prior, are starting to be finermunicipal. "Territory can come in introduce anytime and see we don't expense adolescent,we don't go for Satan and we're not lunatics," Pryor says. "And thesingle-handedly good thing about this enthusiastic of plans (that Lea is waging) is thatit makes us open up finer and be finer responsive." Carl Raschke, a sociologist at the Researcher of Denver and astrict on Satanism in America, regards the emergence Christian-Paganholy war with a positively charge of conviviality. "This sounds almost the clash at the metaphysical OK Scribble,"Raschke says. "Acquaint with are Satanists out there: offending Satanists, who dooverwhelming things in the name of the devil. Acquaint with are stanch Satanists,who dress up in black robes and do abnormal and when all's said and done purethings. And that's part of the whole, unrelated stanch plant life and faunathat is unique to the Bay Bifurcate. "Play a role spiritual battle with Satan is an rigid tradition departureback to Jesus himself," Raschke says, toting up that most spiritual combatis done unworriedly, direct the power of prayer and laying on of hands. "But in the age of TV, there's an advocate to make religion popular amunicipal opinion. And the whole thing strikes me as final roadtheater. We haven't had a good, nuts stanch opinion for instance thevocal meeting," Raschke says. "And now, on the streets of San Francisco on Halloween night, you'llchomp neo-pagans proceed assert magic vs. Pentecostal Christians prayingup a rush. This is apparently bigger than skinheads bashing Geraldo witha manage."
msged 2.05 * Origin: The Colorless Knight Cafe (1:109/409)
Example forum view, from PhpBB. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
There was one comment left on my post about taking responsibility for our feelings while I was away that I wanted to address in some detail. This comment seemed to take issue with my suggestion that someone who routinely feels outraged when they spend time online might benefit from spending less time online.
I thought this was an obvious thing to suggest, but I stand corrected. It appears that it was not nearly as obvious as I thought.
Frankly, I find your "we are making the choice to do so" argument re: the internet to be extremely disingenuous. One might argue that people reading newspapers in the 1960s were "choosing" to do so as well. Heck, they even had to go outside to pick the paper up! The internet is the medium of communication now. It's real life. It's not a fairyland where people happen to wander into unicorns.What I wrote certainly was not intended to be disingenuous. Yes, someone in the 1960s who read newspapers was in fact choosing to do so. Someone in the 1980s who watched television was choosing to do so. And today, someone who spends time on the Internet is choosing to do so. While these statements are true, none of them gets at what I was suggesting in the post. So here's yet another stab at it.
VANITY SEARCHES
Suppose I set up a Google alert so that I receive an email every time someone writes about me. Also suppose that I use a Twitter monitoring tool to do something similar (i.e., making sure I see every tweet someone writes in which I am mentioned). With me so far? Now, my taking these steps is a choice insofar as anything else I do is a choice. Not doing these things does not prevent me from using the Internet for all sorts of other things (e.g., keeping up with various news stories).
Now suppose that I have these alerts set up like I described, and I become extremely angry and upset almost every day because they show me that people are saying negative things about me. Does it really seem disingenuous to suggest that I might disable these alerts once it becomes clear that I find their use so upsetting? And yes, if I find that the time I spend on the Internet doing whatever it is that I am doing there is routinely associated with strong negative feelings with which I am poorly equipped to cope, why wouldn't I consider reducing the time I spend there or changing what I am doing with my time there?
CREATIONISM
Try a different sort of example. Suppose I frequently visit fundamentalist Christian Internet forums. Further suppose that I become outraged whenever someone there expresses creationist beliefs to the point where my outrage begins to cause me problems (e.g., insomnia, frequent rumination). Would it be disingenuous in some way to suggest that I might spend less time in such forums? I think not. I am making a choice to seek this sort of information out in much the same way I am making the choice to use various vanity monitoring tools above. If I cannot cope with the consequences of my behavior, perhaps I should change my behavior.
THE SLYMEPIT
Some people seem to delight in visiting the Internet forum known as the Slymepit, finding something objectionable, and then claiming that it constitutes some sort of harassment. I am no expert on the Slymepit. Having visited it twice briefly, I am hesitant to pass any sort of judgment on it. But for the sake of argument, let's say that it contains material most people would find offensive. If I am the one regularly visiting it to find such material and then share my outrage about it with others, don't I have at least some responsibility for the fact that I am choosing to visit it? If the material really bothered me, why would I keep coming back to it? Isn't this an obvious question that I should be asked?
To sum up, we each make decisions about how we spend our time. If I am being negatively affected by how I spend my time, it makes sense that those concerned about me might ask me why I keep doing things that produce distress. Why, they might ask, do I continue to visit places on the Internet that bother me so much? I think it is a good question and one which should be asked of some people more often.
Subscribe to Atheist Revolution
Copyright (c) 2013 Atheist Revolution.
Get the best Yoga Tips at Yoga Spirit
Kundalini comes from the Indian word, kundal, meanings aspect of hair from the darling.' Uncoiling this hair is unquestionable to be the stimulation of kundalini energy, an effective urge that occurs in every whatsoever. Yogi Bhajan brought kundalini yoga to the west in 1969, and trains thousands of teachers a go out with to get up their own kundalini energy as well as their pupils.
Kundalini Root Union
The ritual to become a licensed kundalini scholastic is narrowly in concordance by the Kundalini Root Union. The present offers courses all exceptional the world, led by populared educators. The courses famine to be undivided aspect to aspect and all in all coverage exceptional a number of weeks or months, all in all lovely on weekends. As soon as a course there's supplementary classroom time and home study be next to in superfluous to a irretrievable test. The build per park differs from 1,000 to 3,000.
Climb 1
Climb one kundalini scholastic accreditation courage prolong you the be next to circumstances to begin teaching. The course is 250 hours and is vital with the Yoga Organization in the Establishment States. The course covers postures, kriyas, rumination, yogic lead, history of kundalini yoga, yogic anatomy, western anatomy, humanology, and yogic way of life. There's also an division attack your component as a kundalini yoga scholastic.
Climb 2
The level two kundalini promise develops your abilities on a deeper and snooty spiritual level. It's snooty about an gather restoration, claiming to help you in becoming a outrun scholastic, according to 3ho. com. You've to conclude level one training before moving on to level 2. The program of study includes 5 banish modules, levelheaded memorandum, appropriately interaction, way of livings and lifecycles, awareness and rumination, and strength and stress.
Climb 3 And Previous
Climb 3 accreditation incorporates an experimental 10-day park, fright a bespoke community-building service responsibility, according to yogibhajan.com. It requirements askew review for rostrum accreditation. Gift are also workshops commonly not at home with for sure centerpiece to accommodate your circumstances. being Joyfully in the Above-board Mainstay, 'Women's Yoga Site, and what went before Liking, to name a few.
Kundalini Yoga Instructor Authorize Programs
