Some theological opinions that people have read into scripture:
* The belief that salvation is by FAITH ALONE (disregarding any role that works play in our eternal destiny)
* The belief that THE BIBLE IS THE ONLY WAY in which God can share truth with his people
* ACCEPTING JESUS AS "SAVIOR AND LORD" is how to be "born-again"
* BAPTISM IS A SYMBOLIC public gesture to represent what has already occurred spiritually
* The EUCHARIST IS SYMBOLIC and the bread and wine remain.... bread and wine.
* ONCE YOU ARE "SAVED" you can't lose your salvation
* The RAPTURE is when Jesus returns and takes believers with him leaving unsaved behind
These are just a few examples of "traditional interpretations" received from others that have been read into the text of Scripture. However, these traditional interpretations cannot be found in the writings of theologians, early Church fathers and the apostles themselves who wrote scripture under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit before the 16th century. So one must either believe that all those before the 16th century "got it wrong" which necessitates the belief that the Holy Spirit was unable to lead the Church in all truth or, there was a secret hidden group of persecuted true believers since John the Baptist who held to these above "traditions." Or the other possibility is that those who hold these post reformation beliefs are guilty of "investing" scripture with their own tradition at the same time insisting they are all "biblical."
Oh, yeah.... The author of the initial statement is none other than Dr. D.A. Carson, Protestant theologian. Sounds like he has been reading from the Church fathers:
"...owing to the depth of Holy Scripture, all do not accept it in one and the same sense, but one understands its words in one way, another in another; so that it seems to be capable of as many interpretations as there are interpreters. " (ST.VINCENT OF LERINS 5TH CENTURY)