Ruler Charlemagne: The greatest of medieval kings was innate in 742, at a place funny. He was of German blood and pronunciation, and lacking some characteristics of his people- prerogative of think, boldness of spirit, principle of tempo, and a improper precision numerous centuries faraway from the chic widen of the modern French. He had little book learning; read completely a few books- but good ones; tried in his old age to learn words, but never sufficiently succeeded; yet he possibly will speak old Teutonic and learned Latin, and held Greek. In 771 Carloman II died, and Charles at twenty-nine became private king. Two existence well along he standard from Pope Hadrian II an acid plead for aid vs. the Lombard Desiderius, who was invading the papal states. Charlemagne besieged and took Pavia, imaginary the upper of Lombardy, constant the Permit of Pepin, and conventional the party of upholder of the Cathedral in all her temporal powers. -- Returning to his capital at Aachen, he began a series of fifty-three campaigns- effectively all led in person- theoretical to going on for out his progress by winning and Christianizing Bavaria and Saxony, destroying the decaying Avars, shielding Italy from the prowling Saracens, and spiraling the buttresses of Francia vs. the expanding Moors of Spain. The Saxons on his eastern line up were pagans; they had burned down a Christian church, and made juicy incursions happening Gaul; these reasons sufficed Charlemagne for eighteen campaigns (772-804), waged with industrious unkindness on both sides. Charles gave the unavailable Saxons a collection amongst designation and death, and had 4500 Saxon rebels beheaded in one day; time was which he proceeded to Thionville to correct the nativity of Christ. -- The progress [of Europe] was split happening counties, each governed in spiritual matters by a bishop or archbishop, and in activist contact by a comes (companion- of the king) or record. A secretive convention of landholders convened two times or thrice a see in each conventional capital to absent upon the authority of the subdivision, and party as a conventional entice of appeals. The dangerous line up counties, or marches, had special governors- graf, margrave, or markherzog; Roland of Roncesvalles, for sort, was overseer of the Breton swiftness. All secretive assignment was suspect to missi dominici- "emissaries of the master"- sent by Charlemagne to leak his requirements to secretive officials, to review their actions, judgments, and accounts; to examination lure, extortion, favoritism, and expenditure, to arrant complaints and upright wrongs, to protect "the Cathedral, the unhealthy, and wards and widows, and the whole race"from malfeasance or oppression, and to put on record to the Ruler the permit of the realm; the Capitulare missorum establishing these emissaries was a Magna Carta for the race, four centuries through England's Magna Carta for the dignity. That this capitulary expected what it theoretical appears from the bubble of the duke of Istria, who, focal point accused by the missi of divers injustices and extortions, was obligated by the Ruler to restore his thievings, make amends every ill-treated man, publicly confess his crimes, and grant undertaking vs. their repetition.... (Charlemagne) had four sequential wives and five mistresses or concubines. His strong vivacity made him extremely malleable to female charms; and his women elected a fragment in him to the strong hold of any other man. His harem put off him some eighteen children, of whom eight were endorsed. -- The ecclesiastics [priests] of the entice and of Rome winked adoringly at the Moslem [Muslim] principles of so Christian a king. He was now person in charge of an progress far supercilious than the Psychosis, surpassed, in the white man's world, completely by the realm of the Abbasid caliphate. But every spread-out line up of progress or knowledge opens up new tribulations. Western Europe had tried to protect itself from the Germans by steal them happening its civilization; but now Germany had to be protected vs. the Norse and the Slavs. The Vikings had by 800 A.D. traditional a country in Jutland, and were prowling the Frisian seashore. Charles hastened up from Rome, built fleets and forts on seashore and rivers, and stationed garrisons at terrorize points. In 810 the king of Jutland invaded Frisia and was repulsed; but rudely thereafter, if we may urge the decode of the Monk of St. Guess, Charlemagne, from his palace at Narbonne, was dazed to see Danish adventurer vessels in the Break of Lyons. Most likely to the same extent he foresaw, equivalent Diocletian, that his overreaching progress advantageous quick assurance at numerous points at when, he split it in 806 amid his three sons- Pepin, Louis, and Charles. But Pepin died in 810, Charles in 811; completely Louis remained, so pressing in piety as to come into sight unfit to ruling a backbreaking and double-crossing world. In spite of, in 813, at a stiff put on show, Louis was admirable from the fight of king to that of emperor, and the old monarch articulated his nunc dimittis: "Consecrated be Thou, O Member of the aristocracy God, Who hast granted me the classiness to see with my own eyes my son seated on my throne!" -- Death: Four months well along, wintering at Aachen, he was in custody with a high restlessness, and advanced pleurisy. He tried to magic potion himself by steal completely liquids; but time was an infection of seven days he died, in the forty-seventh see of his reign and the seventy-second see of his life (814 A.D.). He was mystifying under the ground of the house of worship at Aachen, straight in his testify robes. Tersely all the world called him Carolus Magnus, Karl der Grosse, Charlemagne; and in 1165 A.D., like time had washed in reserve all call back of his mistresses, the Cathedral which he had served so well enrolled him amid the blessed.
Origin: spellscasting.blogspot.com
IF JESUS IS ALMIGHTY GOD... 1. After that why is "God main of Christ Morally AS Christ is main of man"? (1 Cor. 11:3)2. After that why does Scripture faithfully time Jesus as a separate out soul from God? (John 20:17; John 14:1; Dip 10:18; John 17:1-3; etc. In addition to in fantasy, 1 Cor. 11:3; Luke 22:69; etc.) 3. After that how can Jesus "pass on" a God? May possibly Almighty God pass on a God? (Mic. 5:4; Ps. 45:6, 7; 89:26; John 20:17; Rom. 15:6; 2 Cor. 1:3; Eph 1:3; Col 1:3; Dip 15:34; John 17:1-3; In addition to in fantasy, Rev. 1:6; 3:2, 12) 4. After that why does Scripture say he was" uneducated" and is "part of" Creation? (Col. 1:15)5. After that why does Rev. 3:14 say that Jesus is "the beginning of the idea of God"?6. After that why is he punishment to GOD, in the function of we're punishment to him? (1 Cor. 15:27, 28; Eph. 1:17)7. After that why does Micah 5:2 say that Jesus' Microbe was "from juvenile epoch"? 8. After that why does Jesus not know what God knows? (Matt. 24:36, Rev.1:1; Luke 8:45)9. After that why is Jesus equal punishment to God to the same extent he is as high as he thrust ever be? (1 Cor. 15:27, 28)10. After that why does Proverbs 8:22-31 clarify that the Messiah was Bent / Fashioned by God?11. After that why is he not powerful lots to punishment things to himself? (1 Cor. 15:27, Eph. 1:17, 22)12. After that why would he pass on to be "given" any power and authority? (Mt. 28:18; 11:27; Jn. 5:22; 17:2; 3:35; 2 Pet. 1:17)13. After that why did he pass on to" learn" anything? (Heb. 5:8; John 5:19; 8:28)14. After that why is interruption against him not as bad as interruption against the Saintly Spirit? (Mt. 12:31,32; Luke 12:10)15. After that why did Jesus provoke the "Close relative...the in simple terms true God"? (John 17:3)16. After that why did he need to be saved? (Heb. 5:7; John 12:27)17. After that why did he pass on to be "towering" to Conduct and Savior? (Acts 5:31)18. After that how might he be "towering" and "given" a innovative name than he had? (Phil. 2:9-11; Heb. 1:2-4)19. After that why did he pass on to be" given" life in himself? (John 5:25,26)20. After that how can the Close relative be high-class than he? (John 14:28)21. After that how might Jesus be tempted by Satan to the same extent God cannot be tempted with evil? (James 1:13)22. After that why did he glorify the Father? (John 4:22)23. After that why can he not do anything on his own? (John 5:19; 6:38)24. After that why would he pray to anybody? (Luke 22:44; John 17:1,2; Heb. 5:7)25. After that why do John 1:18 and 1 John 4:9 say that Jesus is God's "in simple terms BEGOTTEN Son"? ASV26. After that how can he be God's servant? (Acts 4:26,27,30)27. After that how might he build boldness from an angel? (Luke 22:43)28. After that how might he be a "mediator" amid "God" and man? (1 Tim. 2:5)29. After that how might he be "with" God "(ton theon)"? (John 1:1)30. After that how can he be God's image? (Col. 1:15; Heb. 1:3)31. After that why is he called the "workforce" ("dia") of idea and not the Originator (ek)? (1 Cor. 8:6; John 1:1-3; Prov. 8:30; Heb. 2:10; Col. 1:15,16)32. After that why did Jesus say GOD was "good" in a way that Jesus was not? (Dip 10:18)33. After that why does he pass on an archangel's voice pretty of God's voice? (1 Thess. 4:16)34. After that why is the in simple terms "glorify" given to him the especially given to humans? (Heb. 1:6, cf. Mt. 18:26; Rev. 3:9 - "Proskuneo")35. After that why do various who think this rely on a "few "Accurate, supposed 'proof-texts' pretty of the context of the all the same teaching of the "wonderful" Bible?36. After that how might he be COMMANDED to do anything? (John 12:49; Deut. 18:18)37. After that why did Steven see two separate out entities, GOD and Jesus, and not honestly one God or three persons? (Acts 7:55)38. After that how might he be seen at GOD's unerringly hand? (Luke 22:69; Acts 7:55; Rom. 8:34)39. After that how might Jesus be "towering" (not to become God Himself, but) to the majestic of the "unerringly hand "OF" God"? (Acts 2:33)40. After that why would he pass on to "build" a clarification from God? (Rev.1:1)41. After that why is he called God's "begotten" Son "in advance" he came to earth? (John 3:16; Gal. 4:4; 1 John 4:9)42. After that how might he pass on a "Close relative"? (John 20:17)43. After that how might he come in flesh? (1 Kings 8:27; Acts 17:24,25)44. After that why did he not come in his "own" name? (John 5:41-44)45. After that why did Jesus "come down from fantasy to do God's thrust" and not his own will? (Luke 22:42; John 6:38; John 5:30; John 8:42) 46. After that how might he echo "in advance" GOD? (Heb. 9:24) 47. After that how might he die? Can God die? Can part of God die? (Rom. 5:10; Acts 5:30; 1 Cor. 15:3; Hab.1:12; cf. 1 Tim. 6:16; Num. 23:19; Ps. 90:2; Dan. 6:25-26)48. After that why is it that "God" resurrected Jesus? (Acts 2:32)49. After that why can we see him if "no man has seen God at any time"? (John 1:18)50. After that why is donate not one free Scripture where Jesus is called "God the Son," (outfit to persons declaring "God, the Close relative)?51. How is it that the Jews brusque up some two-faced witnesses to make up lies to bring in a death result for Jesus, but neither the Jewish officials nor even one of these two-faced witnesses made a call that he was God or reciprocally God? (Matt. 26:59-67)52. John SUMMED UP HIS Unprocessed GOSPEL by saying that it was in black and white that we may think "that Jesus is the Christ, the SON "of" God." Why is donate is no introduce in that outline of the wonderful Gospel of what "would" be the record weighty thing of all - that Jesus is God? (John 20:31)53. How might Jesus teach in the Jewish SYNAGOGUES and the TEMPLE? This would never ensue if "any" of the institution aimed he claimed to be God (or that his followers aimed such a thing). - Matt. 26:55; John 7:14, 28. Matt. 4:23.54. How might Jesus' followers teach in Jewish SYNAGOGUES following Jesus' death and for the put your feet up of that initial century (at negligible)? Anew, this would not pass on been permitted if donate were "any" impression that they aimed Jesus to be God. Acts 9:20; 13:5, Acts 13:13-15.IF THE Saintly Vivacity IS ALMIGHTY GOD...1. After that why do quotes from Trinitarians give that the Saintly Vivacity is not God but if possible is a pitch from God? 2. After that why would Jews instructed in the Old Tombstone scriptures and in the teachings of John the Baptist, NOT Intensity Acquaint with In the function of THE Saintly Vivacity WAS? (Acts 19:2)3. After that why isn't the Saintly Vivacity given outfit name in the Bible?4. After that why didn't Jesus ever teach that the Saintly Vivacity was God tabled with the Close relative and Son?5. After that why does the Bible facet the Saintly Vivacity as an "it"? (Is. 34:16 ASV, KJV; Put off 11:17, 25 ASV, KJV, RSV, NRSV, AT, LB, NEB, REB, NAB, JB, NJB; and Romans 8:16, 26 in the KJV.)6. After that why does the Bible facet the Saintly Vivacity as a thing that can be poured out taking part in portions? (Acts 2:17, 18, 33; Put off 11:17, 25) 7. After that why is the holy spirit unrevealed and shadowy from all of the other holy spirits?8. After that why did the Congregation of Nicaea in 325 AD inattention the Saintly Vivacity as a quantity of the Godhead to the same extent they made Jesus hero in 325 AD? Why did they linger until the Congregation of Constantinople in 381 AD to append the Saintly Vivacity in the formula?9. After that wouldn't the water and blood be nation too according to Trinitarian thoughts and 1 John 5:8?10. After that why is the Saintly Vivacity sandwiched amid a list of One at 2 Cor. 6:6? 11. After that why does the NT Greek Vocabulary describes the Saintly Vivacity as "this" at Acts 2:33?12. After that why is it that nowhere in the Bible is the Saintly Vivacity ever alleged to be an outfit quantity of a trinity?13. After that why is it that nowhere is it mentioned in the Bible the words, "God, the Saintly Vivacity," or "The Saintly Vivacity is God"?14. After that why is it that donate is never mentioned a opinion, dream or free name in scripture wherein God and the Saintly Vivacity are on view as the especially person?IF THE TRINITY Thinking IS A BIBLE Tuition...1. After that why do Scores of encyclopedias setting that "... the view of the Trinity was of stupid and reasonably in arrears formation; that it had its Microbe IN A Sordid Fully Unfamiliar FROM THAT OF THE JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES; that it grew up, and was INGRAFTED on Christianity"? - p. 34, The "Religious of the Firstly Three Centuries", Alvan Lamson, D.D.2. After that why do various encyclopedias, dictionaries and other sources (in the company of Sir Isaac Newton) setting that the "Trinity was a "PAGAN Profligacy" imposed on Christianity in the fourth century by Athanasius"?3. After that why does the Bible faithfully direct God by juicy soul pronouns: "I, "Me, He, and "Him" pretty of "We", "Us", "They" or "Them"?4. After that why does 2 Cor. 13:14 say that the Lady Jesus Christ is one group, the Saintly Vivacity is something else group (whether a soul or a thing), and that "GOD" IS Extra Opposing INDIVIDUAL?5. After that why is donate not even one Scripture which devotedly defines the Trinity? 6. After that why is donate not even one Scripture of a opinion, dream, or Skilled name wherein God is on view as three persons?7. After that why is donate not even one Scripture where God is described using the word "three"?
I had this great idea for a blog post yesterday, but forgot it before I had time to write it up. So you got a half drunken ramble about how I dig the Castlevania games last night.
Waking up refreshed, I remember!
I was wondering why there aren't many Australian animals in the Monster sections of D&D products. No kangaroos, no dingos (although the blink dog is described as dingo-like), no wombats, no cassowaries, no frill-necked lizards, no bandicoots, no Tasmanian devils.
The standard D&D milieu has a mix of European, Asian, African, North American, and South American animals. You can find all kinds of animals from these five continents in a standard D&D wandering monster list, often jumbled together.
Monsters also range in source. It's no problem to have a minotaur lair near a troll, with an oni (ogre mage) around the bend, and the PCs summon a djinni from a ring to help them battle all three.
Would throwing in a herd of blood-thirsty wallabies really harm immersion in that sort of setting?
And who wouldn't want to use a Giant Carnivorous Platypus in their game?
GIANT CARNIVOROUS PLATYPUS
AC: 5 (15)
HD: 8*
Move: 90 (30)
Attacks: 2 claws
Damage: 1d4/1d4 plus poison
Save As: F4
Number Appearing: 1d4 (2d4)
Morale: 8
Treasure Type: C
Alignment: Chaotic
XP: 1200
Giant Carnivorous Platypuses are 10' long, duck-billed, web-footed nocturnal monstrosities that live in rivers, lakes and dungeons. They prefer to feed on giant insects, but savor the taste of human flesh as well.
A Giant Carnivorous Platypus attacks with its clawed feet, inflicting small amounts of damage, but the victim must Save vs. Poison or die in 1d6 rounds, writhing and screaming in agony the whole time. Even those that pass the save will be unable to take any actions for 1 round as the poison burns through their veins.
Platypus bills, claws and pelts are sometimes prized by wizards for spell research. It is rumored that the platypus is a combination of a duck, beaver, and scorpion by a crazed wizard.
Edit--forgot the number appearing!
